The Feather Step is one of the most iconic figures in Foxtrot, often described as the âsignatureâ of the dance. Despite its reputation for being notoriously difficult â sometimes jokingly called the â$40,000 stepâ â the Feather is not mystical or secret. Its challenge lies in its simplicity where the 'feather finish' at the end of the Feather Step is:
two forward steps during which there is a 45o rotation of the frame and hips with a slight sway to the right as a result of the forward step on the left foot. It's that simple.
The term âfeatherâ comes from the lightness of the action. The final step does not crash into Outside Partner, it feathers out softly and smoothly, giving the impression of floating forward without interruption. When done correctly, the Feather Step embodies the very character of Foxtrot: smooth, continuous, and effortless.
At its essence, the Feather Step is just three steps forward for the Leader which the Dance Charts describe as (for the Leader):
This describes the consequence of what is happening but not how it happens. It also encourages the Leader to 'do CBM' on the start of Step 1 which creates a \(45^o\) Frame rotation. Since this is done during the first step Follower might easily interpret it as a 'commence to turn right' at which point the partnership is heading in the wrong direction. Additionally it takes a lot of energy to rotate to \(45^o\) at the start of Step 1 and that energy has nowhere to go (breaking Least Action) as the position has to be held for the forward steps on 2 and 3. It's an awkward movement after which the RF is deliberately 'placed in CBMP'.
The result looks ragged and contrived which is far from the smoothness this figure needs. The student are then told 'to practice more' which results in them continuing to make the same mistakes over and over.
Which is far easier, doesn't break Least Action or any other physics. Did we mention it's far, far easier?
For the Leader:
The Followerâs part complements this with three backward steps.
It's the continuous rotation of the Frame and hips that creates the CBM during Step 1 and the 'Left Side Leading' during Step 2. This rotation may or may not continue to the end of Step 3 when weight is applied to the RF depending on the shape needed to naturally place the RF in CBMP.
You will find that this almost guarantees that you will be in the correct 'outside partner' position for the RF forward Feather Finish. The CBMP will happen as a result of the angle of the hips and Frame as shown below:
This graph shows that there is a gradual rotation of the Frame (blue) and hips (red) over the 3 steps of the figure. For Outside Partner to be achieved at the end of step 3 requires a rotation of approximately 45o.
The ISTD charts often show an extra preceding step (such as LF forward before the Feather) or add a step after it, depending on what figure itâs linking from or to. This can make the Feather look like a 4-step action on paper.
In reality, the core Feather Step is 3 steps.
The Feather Finish is simply the last two steps of the Feather, used as an open finish after other figures.
We don't worry about CBMP as it just happens as a result of the hip and Frame position at the end of Step 3 or the end of an Open Finish.
âForward in line with or across the line of the standing foot.â
Thatâs what every syllabus manual says. It makes CBMP sound like a discrete placement task: âput your moving foot right here, across this line.â In reality that the foot placement has been setup during the preceding step and is not something you consciously do.
CBMP is not an action â itâs a geometry.
It happens because the frame rotates, not because the dancer consciously shoves the moving foot across.
In practice: as long as the moving foot lands in the general corridor of the standing legâs line, the Outside Partner relationship works.
The exact âcorridorâ depends on body size, hip width, frame shape, and partner relationship.
A tall narrow-hipped Leader will show less apparent âcross.â
A shorter wide-hipped Leader may show more.
Both are correct â the partnership geometry is what matters.
If Leaders try to force the moving foot exactly across the standing leg, it destabilizes balance.
It also pulls the Follower offline or into collision.
It turns a natural consequence into an artificial thing to do, which kills the âfeatheredâ aesthetic (it feels awful too).
\(\vec{V_f} = \dfrac{dθ}{dt} à r\)
Where:
\(\vec{V_f}\) must be a gradual progression to setup the Frame and Hip rotation to enable CBMP to occur without the dancer 'having to plop their foot there'.
CBMP is a consequence, not a placement.
The moving foot ends up âin line with or across the standing footâ only because the frame has rotated into Outside Partner. The literal syllabus definition describes the result, not the action.
In practice, so long as the moving foot tracks generally along the standing legâs line â adjusted for body size and frame â the CBMP is correct. The true lead is the rotational geometry of the torso, not the foot placement.
For the Leader: HT, T, TH For the Follower: TH, TH, TH
Yes, that means there is a very special Rise and Fall for a Feather (or Open) Finish.
There is no "static L side lead" â the lead side is moving relative to the pelvis and spine.
The foot goes to CBMP because of what happened in Steps 1 and 2. Trying to force it there without the proper body action will result in instability and poor partnering.