If you've ever been told:
and wondered what it meant you're not alone. The word “energy” in dance has become a grab bag of vague metaphors, tossed around to describe everything from timing to tension to "you just didn't feel right."
Before this gets into the math and physics we can simplify things by saying:
Energy has two components:
And that's it! Everything else is understanding and controlling those values.
In physics, energy is the capacity to do "work" and in dance we can define if as the "capacity to move and travel in dancing"
There are two forms of energy that show up most often:
Kinetic Energy is the energy of motion. In partner dancing, this is everything. It's what keeps you moving from step to step, turn to turn. It can be thought of as the energy used when you throw a ball.
> KE = ½ × m × v²
> (mass × velocity squared)
The amount (or magnitude) of the KE is directly related to:
Speed, more speed = more KE
Weight The heavier something is, the more KE it will have. (Fun fact, the terms "weight" and "mass" can be considered the same on Planet Earth).
In dance, this translates to:
Potential Energy is stored energy — usually due to height or compression.
PE = m × g × h
(mass × gravity × height)
In reality the human body cannot effectively store PE so it only has an effect when lowering (the 'fall' in 'rise and fall').
In dancing we can say that "we will always take the path the requires the least action (or effort)" It's a fascinating subject as it crops up time and again as we progress. Read about how Least Action affects your dancing
While PE matters when lowering, Kinetic Energy is king in most figures. Dancing is dynamic — we’re constantly converting muscle effort into motion. So if someone says “give it more energy,” and you respond by lifting your shoulders or emoting harder... physics will be politely unimpressed. It would also have helped if that person had said "how much" energy and "in what direction".
As we previously stated, energy (such as KE) has two components:
Which results in these possibilities:
And here's the proof of the Improbability of Synchronization.
Therefore one of the dancers has to synchronize with the other in terms of energy magnitude and direction. But who? How?
This in turn validates that there is no such thing as Leader and Follower in the traditional sense. Instead the Leader instigates an action and synchronizes with whatever the Follower does.
This is not action-reaction which is something the math doesn't support.
No push-pull either!
We'll explain the best way to use Energy and why "The Leader Leads and the Follower Follows" has never (and will never) work.
TL;DR: We’ve done the overthinking so you don’t have to.
Kinetic Energy (KE) is defined as:
\[ KE = \frac{1}{2} m v^2\]
Let’s assume:
Two dancers:
Leader = 85 kg
Follower = 65 kg
Dancing speed range: 0.5 m/s to 2.0 m/s
Each dancer picks a velocity at random from that range
We ask:
> What’s the chance that both dancers have the same KE?
Let’s define “same” as being within ±5% of each other.
Even if the velocities match, the different masses cause a difference in KE.
Example:
\[ v = 1.25 \, \text{m/s}\]
Leader:
\[ KE_L = \frac{1}{2} \times 85 \times (1.25)^2 = 66.4 \, \text{J}\]
Follower:
\[ KE_F = \frac{1}{2} \times 70 \times (1.25)^2 = 54.7 \, \text{J}\]
→ Difference: ~17%
If both dancers pick their speeds randomly from [0.5, 2.0] m/s:
The chance of their KE values being within 5% of each other is very low
Simulations suggest:
With equal mass → ~10% chance
With unequal mass → often < 5%
> Matching KE between two dancers is statistically unlikely, especially if their body types differ.
This supports the principle:
> Connection isn’t about both people having energy - it’s about one person initiating a vector and the other syncing to it.
Force = mass × acceleration
Force is a Physics term and we are not shoving people around. Ew. No. Ugh